![]() ![]() In 2010, the brand was purchased from Midleton by William Grant & Sons, the largest independent distiller of whisky in Scotland (who own a number of global whisky brands). The distillery was closed down in the mid-20th century, and remaining stocks were transferred to Powers & Son – which was eventually merged with Midleton in the great Irish whisky consolidation of the 1970s. Williams, a general manager and later owner of the distillery. – the latter part derived from the initials of Daniel E. The name of this brand eventually changed to Tullamore D.E.W. Originally produced in Tullamore, County Offaly, Ireland, the Tullamore distillery was established in the early 19th century. This is a review of the entry-level Tullamore Dew Original, a no-age-statement (NAS) blended Irish whisky – and one of the best selling Irish whiskies in the world. The lowest score comes from Oliver of Dramming. Ruben of Whisky Notes and Dominic of Whisky Advocate both give it a below average score (but positive reviews). ![]() Lawrence of Malt Maniacs gives it a very high score, as does Richard of Whiskey Reviewer. I think the Meta-Critic average score is fair. Higher proof would have been great, along with a longer lasting finish, but a good blend for what it is. I like a nice Port finish on a fairly simple base whisky, like Pike Creek 10yo and Kavalan Concertmaster. This Grant’s 18yo reminds me more of the later, although sweeter in this case. Certainly higher quality than regular NAS blends. Not bad for a blend, but a longer finish would be nice.Ī good integration of malt and grain whiskies – heavier on the malt, it seems to me. A winey Port finish on the fade out, with a bit of oaky bitterness. Wish it was higher proof, as it has a rather watery mouthfeel (as expected).įinish: Medium-short. Still, this is one for those with a sweet tooth. ![]() Malty, which is nice for a blend (i.e., not particularly grainy). Figs again, and the standard apples and pear. Palate: Tons of honey and caramel to start, very sweet. A bit spirity, but no real solvent off-notes – definitely shows its extended age. A slight bit of funk, which adds to character. A base of apple and pear juice, with figs and raisins. Nose: Fairly rich and complex nose, likely owing to the Port finishing. Storas 21yo Rare Cask Reserves Blended: 8.69 ± 0.11 on 4 reviews ($$$)Īs you can see, that’s a top score for an age-stated blended scotch. Johnnie Walker Green Label: 8.53 ± 0.35 on 21 reviews ($$$$) Johnnie Walker Blue Label: 8.53 ± 0.34 on 17 reviews ($$$$$) Johnnie Walker 12yo Black Label: 8.26 ± 0.47 on 24 reviews ($$) Hankey Bannister Original: 7.87 ± 0.31 on 6 reviews ($) Hankey Bannister 21yo Partner’s Reserve: 8.55 ± 0.43 on 5 reviews ($$$$) Hankey Bannister 12yo Regency: 8.65 ± 0.24 on 7 reviews ($$) ![]() Grant’s Family Reserve Blended: 7.69 ± 0.66 on 14 reviews ($) Grant’s Blended Sherry Cask: 8.00 ± 0.21 on 6 reviews ($) I presume it is chill-filtered and colouring has been added. Grant’s 18 yo is bottled at the industry-standard 40% ABV. And I found another whisky enthusiast willing to take a gamble and split the bottle with me, thus further lowering my risk. It is reasonably priced at the LCBO ($80 CAD, bought on sale for $64). Grant’s 18 yo has been finished in Port casks, which typically brings in a fruity character that I quite like. So what drew me to buying this bottle? In my experience, age-stated blends are generally pretty decent, especially from William Grant and Sons (e.g., the Storas 21 yo). Although I haven’t reviewed it, I found that no-age-statement (NAS) blend to be very basic, and would not recommended it. Prior to this premium age-stated release, I’ve only had the entry-level Grant’s blend (known as “Grant’s Family Reserve”). This is a limited release of an age-stated version of the Grant’s line of blended scotch whisky (not to be confused with Glen Grant single malts). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |